Intersectionality, coloniality, and environmental law: A case study of Mount Ungaran landscape protection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesia’s legal framework, particularly Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, guarantees the right to a good and healthy environment and provides legal avenues for public participation in environmental protection. However, the implementation of formal legal mechanisms often fails to adequately address socio-ecological realities at the local level. This article explores the interconnections between intersectionality, coloniality, and environmental law in the context of protecting the Mount Ungaran landscape in Indonesia. This study employs an intersectional environmental justice approach as its theoretical framework to examine how environmental governance extends beyond formal regulations to encompass power structures and colonial legacies that shape the unequal distribution of environmental benefits and burdens. Intersectionality is used to map how social identities—such as economic status, gender positioning, and relationships with Indigenous and local communities—interact with power relations in landscape management, resulting in environmental protection practices that are neither equitable nor inclusive. This study concludes that integrating an intersectional perspective and acknowledging colonial legacies in the formulation and implementation of environmental law are essential to strengthening the fair and sustainable protection of the Mount Ungaran landscape.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052
Arizona, Y., & Cahyadi, E. R. (2013). Masyarakat adat dan konflik agraria di Indonesia. Epistema Institute.
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2013). Law and social theory (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bullard, R. D. (1993). Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots. South End Press.
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Faure, M., & Visser, M. (2019). Law and economics of environmental policy: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
McCarthy, J. F., & Robinson, K. (2016). Land, economic development, social justice and environmental management in Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 37(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12154
McEvoy, K., & McGregor, L. (2019). Routledge handbook of human rights and transitional justice. Routledge.
Pulido, L. (2017). Geographies of race and ethnicity II: Environmental racism, racial capitalism and state-sanctioned violence. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646495
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
Rahman, M. A., Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., & Santosa, Y. (2018). Fragmentasi habitat dan keanekaragaman burung di Gunung Ungaran, Jawa Tengah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
Situmorang, M. (2021). Environmental law enforcement in Indonesia: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 18(2), 145–162.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
London Environment Network. (2020). Environmental justice and intersectionality. https://www.londonenvironment.net
Wikipedia contributors. (2024). Environmental justice. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_justice