Ableism, mental health, and environmental change: Critical ecology beyond Western paradigms
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the intersections of ableism, mental health, and environmental change through a critical ecological framework grounded in intersectionality and decolonial thought. Dominant responses to ecological crisis within Western paradigms tend to frame climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution as technical or managerial problems, marginalizing the embodied, psychological, and relational dimensions of ecological harm. Disabled people, neurodivergent individuals, and those experiencing mental distress are disproportionately affected by environmental degradation, yet their experiences and knowledges remain peripheral within environmental theory and policy. Drawing on disability studies, political ecology, and Indigenous and non-Western ecological scholarship, this article argues that ableism functions as a structuring logic within Western ecological paradigms, shaping assumptions about resilience, productivity, adaptation, and value. Through a critical synthesis of interdisciplinary literature and a set of analytical case interventions, this article advances critical ecology as an approach that centers interdependence, vulnerability, and care as ecological principles rather than deficits. It contributes to decolonial ecological debates by demonstrating how disability and mental distress expose the limitations of Western ontologies of control and autonomy and by articulating alternative ecological imaginaries grounded in relational responsibility, collective survival, and epistemic plurality.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Albrecht, G. (2011). Chronic environmental change: Emerging “psychoterratic” syndromes. In I. Weissbecker (Ed.), Climate change and human well-being: Global challenges and opportunities (pp. 43–56). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3.
Burstow, B. (2015). Psychiatry and the business of madness: An ethical and epistemological accounting. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503855.
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181.
Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.
Clayton, S., Manning, C., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, and ecoAmerica.
Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2.
Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/515799.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory.NWSA Journal, 14(3), 1–32, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/37970.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt16gz79x.
Klinenberg, E. (2015). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Nixon, R. (2013).Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan Education.
Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2018).Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
Povinelli, E. A. (2011). Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394570.
Pulido, L. (2017). Geographies of race and ethnicity II: Environmental racism, racial capitalism and state-sanctioned violence. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 524–533, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646495.
Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Rose, N. (2018). Our psychiatric future. Polity Press.
Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
Tierney, K. (2014). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford University Press.
Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. University of Toronto Press.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor.Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40, https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n38.04.
Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. Sage.
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1-2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621.
Whyte, K. P., Talley, J., & Gibson, J. (2020). Indigenous mobility traditions, colonialism, and the Anthropocene. Mobilities, 14(3), 319–335.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge.